<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is face-to-face the new social networking fad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.svahaconcepts.com/blog/marketing/is-face-to-face-the-new-social-networking-fad/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.svahaconcepts.com/blog/communicating-your-message/is-face-to-face-the-new-social-networking-fad</link>
	<description>Content that Connects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:12:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.svahaconcepts.com/blog/communicating-your-message/is-face-to-face-the-new-social-networking-fad/comment-page-1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svahaconcepts.com/blog/?p=383#comment-77</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jen&lt;/strong&gt; - Thank you.  And actually, I should&#039;ve credited you, because it was a conversation with you that got me thinking about all this!

So I&#039;m specially glad that you commented, and DELIGHTED that you&#039;re joining the class!

Interesting point on the traditional networking groups.  You&#039;ve hit on something here - I think that the traditional groups could &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; stand to find ways to generate more of that fizz.  But ... hm! how?  Thoughts, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jen</strong> &#8211; Thank you.  And actually, I should&#8217;ve credited you, because it was a conversation with you that got me thinking about all this!</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m specially glad that you commented, and DELIGHTED that you&#8217;re joining the class!</p>
<p>Interesting point on the traditional networking groups.  You&#8217;ve hit on something here &#8211; I think that the traditional groups could <em>really</em> stand to find ways to generate more of that fizz.  But &#8230; hm! how?  Thoughts, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Hofmann</title>
		<link>http://www.svahaconcepts.com/blog/communicating-your-message/is-face-to-face-the-new-social-networking-fad/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Hofmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.svahaconcepts.com/blog/?p=383#comment-76</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what I&#039;ve been thinking for months now. That&#039;s why sites like Biznik.com and Twitter &quot;Twee-Ups&quot; are gaining so much popularity - people actually get to *meet*.

It makes me think, however, that traditional networking groups need to get clued in on this. They lack the fizz and excitement that web-initiated-connections-who-then-meet-in-person do. I&#039;m not desperate for leads. I just want to connect - and see what it leads to.

Nicely done, Grace. I plan to tweet it up!

:) Jen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what I&#8217;ve been thinking for months now. That&#8217;s why sites like Biznik.com and Twitter &#8220;Twee-Ups&#8221; are gaining so much popularity &#8211; people actually get to *meet*.</p>
<p>It makes me think, however, that traditional networking groups need to get clued in on this. They lack the fizz and excitement that web-initiated-connections-who-then-meet-in-person do. I&#8217;m not desperate for leads. I just want to connect &#8211; and see what it leads to.</p>
<p>Nicely done, Grace. I plan to tweet it up!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.svahaconcepts.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Jen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

